<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: How to Write SEO Friendly Blog Posts</title> <atom:link href="http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/</link> <description>Learn to Build Kick-Ass Websites the Hard Way</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: James Hopkin</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-3676</link> <dc:creator>James Hopkin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-3676</guid> <description>Part of writing online is linked, so they must learn to do well and often. It is important that liaison and linkage with relevant keywords as anchor text. The anchor text is the text that is linked, and these words have the greatest effect on the ranking of search engines, in particular the links from site to site.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.downloadtorrents.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; bittorrent movies&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of writing online is linked, so they must learn to do well and often. It is important that liaison and linkage with relevant keywords as anchor text. The anchor text is the text that is linked, and these words have the greatest effect on the ranking of search engines, in particular the links from site to site.</p><p><a href="http://www.downloadtorrents.org" rel="nofollow"> bittorrent movies</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Be careful what you read (about SEO) &#171; This is Zemalf</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-3675</link> <dc:creator>Be careful what you read (about SEO) &#171; This is Zemalf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:56:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-3675</guid> <description>[...] begin search engine optimization for your blog, check out my posts about blog SEO basics and simple blog post SEO. Here are some comments from the posts by the readers: &#8220;How come nobody ever said it so [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] begin search engine optimization for your blog, check out my posts about blog SEO basics and simple blog post SEO. Here are some comments from the posts by the readers: &#8220;How come nobody ever said it so [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-3597</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-3597</guid> <description>I came back to this post after 9 months to re-work it a bit, and inspired by your comment Corinne I edited the post headline to include &quot;non-techie&quot; and &quot;gobblely goop&quot; :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came back to this post after 9 months to re-work it a bit, and inspired by your comment Corinne I edited the post headline to include &#8220;non-techie&#8221; and &#8220;gobblely goop&#8221; :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jerick Thomas</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-3266</link> <dc:creator>Jerick Thomas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 07:45:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-3266</guid> <description>That first thing that we should consider before we write SEO blog is choose good keyword and description for it. Because keyword is the most important thing to promote your blog effectively.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That first thing that we should consider before we write SEO blog is choose good keyword and description for it. Because keyword is the most important thing to promote your blog effectively.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-2913</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:40:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-2913</guid> <description>The image title-attribute (not to be confused with the title tag) is far less significant for SEO than the alt-text. The title can even be ignored in terms of SEO. However, in most browsers, the text in the title-attribute will be shown as a tool-tip = can be relevant for users, not so much for SEO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The image alt-text affects the on-page SEO, alt-text is used for image-search, alt-text is the &quot;anchor-text&quot; if the image is a link, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thus, image title-attribute could be &quot;call to action&quot; when alt-attribute should always describe the image with a good keyword phrase.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The image title-attribute (not to be confused with the title tag) is far less significant for SEO than the alt-text. The title can even be ignored in terms of SEO. However, in most browsers, the text in the title-attribute will be shown as a tool-tip = can be relevant for users, not so much for SEO.</p><p>The image alt-text affects the on-page SEO, alt-text is used for image-search, alt-text is the &#8220;anchor-text&#8221; if the image is a link, etc.</p><p>Thus, image title-attribute could be &#8220;call to action&#8221; when alt-attribute should always describe the image with a good keyword phrase.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-2528</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:40:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-2528</guid> <description>The image title-attribute (not to be confused with the title tag) is far less significant for SEO than the alt-text. The title can even be ignored in terms of SEO. However, in most browsers, the text in the title-attribute will be shown as a tool-tip = can be relevant for users, not so much for SEO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The image alt-text affects the on-page SEO, alt-text is used for image-search, alt-text is the &quot;anchor-text&quot; if the image is a link, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thus, image title-attribute could be &quot;call to action&quot; when alt-attribute should always describe the image with a good keyword phrase.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The image title-attribute (not to be confused with the title tag) is far less significant for SEO than the alt-text. The title can even be ignored in terms of SEO. However, in most browsers, the text in the title-attribute will be shown as a tool-tip = can be relevant for users, not so much for SEO.</p><p>The image alt-text affects the on-page SEO, alt-text is used for image-search, alt-text is the &#8220;anchor-text&#8221; if the image is a link, etc.</p><p>Thus, image title-attribute could be &#8220;call to action&#8221; when alt-attribute should always describe the image with a good keyword phrase.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Massy</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-2524</link> <dc:creator>Massy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 04:46:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-2524</guid> <description>What&#039;s the difference between image alt tags and image title tags in terms of SEO?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s the difference between image alt tags and image title tags in terms of SEO?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-2024</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:39:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-2024</guid> <description>Hmm, you are probably right about the directories now that I think of it. The guys at SEOmoz have been talking about it, and I suggest you take a look at those links on the previous comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;p.s. edited your comment as requested, although I think with Disqus you can go and edit them yourself too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, you are probably right about the directories now that I think of it. The guys at SEOmoz have been talking about it, and I suggest you take a look at those links on the previous comment.</p><p>p.s. edited your comment as requested, although I think with Disqus you can go and edit them yourself too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keller Hawthorne</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-2017</link> <dc:creator>Keller Hawthorne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:09:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-2017</guid> <description>I would say the reason directories are authoritative is because of how many websites link to them - not how many they link to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s an interesting discussion and I want to learn more about it. Like I said, I&#039;ve never come across this concept, so I&#039;m definitely eager to learn more!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW: Please feel free to remove the &quot;V&quot; word from my comment - I should have been more vague and not used that term.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say the reason directories are authoritative is because of how many websites link to them &#8211; not how many they link to.</p><p>It&#39;s an interesting discussion and I want to learn more about it. Like I said, I&#39;ve never come across this concept, so I&#39;m definitely eager to learn more!</p><p>BTW: Please feel free to remove the &#8220;V&#8221; word from my comment &#8211; I should have been more vague and not used that term.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1974</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:53:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1974</guid> <description>Krizia. I will have to delete your blog comment unless you come and change the blog commenter &quot;name&quot; (or leave a new comment with more real name). Using a website name is against my comment policy (I much more prefer Krizia). Thanks for understanding.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krizia. I will have to delete your blog comment unless you come and change the blog commenter &#8220;name&#8221; (or leave a new comment with more real name). Using a website name is against my comment policy (I much more prefer Krizia). Thanks for understanding.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1973</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:50:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1973</guid> <description>Rich, unfortunately I have to delete your comment unless you go and change the commenter name. &quot;Link Money&quot; comes of as SPAM and it&#039;s against my comment policy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, unfortunately I have to delete your comment unless you go and change the commenter name. &#8220;Link Money&#8221; comes of as SPAM and it&#39;s against my comment policy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1965</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:10:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1965</guid> <description>Thanks Keller for the comment. Linking out to trustworthy / authoritative sites is a tricky thing, but it does work... It&#039;s a theory I&#039;ve been working on, but it&#039;s not something I made up, others think the same way:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seomoz.org/blog/5-reasons-you-should-link-out-to-others-from-your-website&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.seomoz.org/blog/5-reasons-you-should...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seobook.com/outbound-linking-fun-and-profit&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.seobook.com/outbound-linking-fun-and...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google-pagerank/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, linking out won&#039;t &quot;save&quot; your otherwise shady site, e.g. a blue pill site you mentioned as an example, but showing Google that you agree with them on what sites are good for a topic (in the anchor text), they seem to love you back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the other thing is, what do &quot;honest&quot; web pages do that spammers don&#039;t? They link!! Spammers ONLY link to the things they&#039;re trying to sell, or they don&#039;t link at all in hopes to get AdSense clicks - Search Engines have noticed this and value sites that do what is right = link out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More proof? What are the most authoritative sites online? Directories, right? And pages like Wikipedia that link out like crazy. Perhaps it&#039;s time for us bloggers to take a notice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Become a hub and the ultimate source of information for a subject (which you achieve by linking out to all the best sources) and there&#039;s a chance YOU become the authority for that subject (for making the research and finding all those great sources).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;p.s. I changed the colors of my theme yes (thanks for noticing!), as the gray coloring started to get old and depressing, so I needed something cheerful, thus - green it is for now :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Keller for the comment. Linking out to trustworthy / authoritative sites is a tricky thing, but it does work&#8230; It&#39;s a theory I&#39;ve been working on, but it&#39;s not something I made up, others think the same way:</p><p><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/5-reasons-you-should-link-out-to-others-from-your-website" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/5-reasons-you-should" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomoz.org/blog/5-reasons-you-should</a>&#8230;<br /><a href="http://www.seobook.com/outbound-linking-fun-and-profit" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.seobook.com/outbound-linking-fun-and" rel="nofollow">http://www.seobook.com/outbound-linking-fun-and</a>&#8230;<br /><a href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google-pagerank/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google</a>&#8230;</p><p>Of course, linking out won&#39;t &#8220;save&#8221; your otherwise shady site, e.g. a blue pill site you mentioned as an example, but showing Google that you agree with them on what sites are good for a topic (in the anchor text), they seem to love you back.</p><p>And the other thing is, what do &#8220;honest&#8221; web pages do that spammers don&#39;t? They link!! Spammers ONLY link to the things they&#39;re trying to sell, or they don&#39;t link at all in hopes to get AdSense clicks &#8211; Search Engines have noticed this and value sites that do what is right = link out.</p><p>More proof? What are the most authoritative sites online? Directories, right? And pages like Wikipedia that link out like crazy. Perhaps it&#39;s time for us bloggers to take a notice.</p><p>Become a hub and the ultimate source of information for a subject (which you achieve by linking out to all the best sources) and there&#39;s a chance YOU become the authority for that subject (for making the research and finding all those great sources).</p><p>p.s. I changed the colors of my theme yes (thanks for noticing!), as the gray coloring started to get old and depressing, so I needed something cheerful, thus &#8211; green it is for now :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keller Hawthorne</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1962</link> <dc:creator>Keller Hawthorne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:43:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1962</guid> <description>Hey Antti! You&#039;ve updated your theme - nice and clean :).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You know I love SEO talk and I was excited to read your post. You definitely pointed out all of the important steps that need to be taken in order to optimize a blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do have to put my input in on one particular part. You mentioned linking out to other websites as a form of building authority and rankings for your own site. I have never heard about this form of link optimization.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Every time you link to another page, you share your PageRank with that page, so I would NOT recommend linking out as much as possible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How does linking to a quality site actually increase your authority? What if I had a Viagra site and I link to Wikipedia? I don&#039;t believe that would make my Viagra site stronger SEO wise. From everything I&#039;ve learned, it&#039;s not about who you link to - it&#039;s about who links to you. Otherwise, any spammer could simply link to every quality site on the Internet and become an authority.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would love to hear your points on this!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Antti! You&#39;ve updated your theme &#8211; nice and clean :).</p><p>You know I love SEO talk and I was excited to read your post. You definitely pointed out all of the important steps that need to be taken in order to optimize a blog.</p><p>I do have to put my input in on one particular part. You mentioned linking out to other websites as a form of building authority and rankings for your own site. I have never heard about this form of link optimization.</p><p>Every time you link to another page, you share your PageRank with that page, so I would NOT recommend linking out as much as possible.</p><p>How does linking to a quality site actually increase your authority? What if I had a Viagra site and I link to Wikipedia? I don&#39;t believe that would make my Viagra site stronger SEO wise. From everything I&#39;ve learned, it&#39;s not about who you link to &#8211; it&#39;s about who links to you. Otherwise, any spammer could simply link to every quality site on the Internet and become an authority.</p><p>I would love to hear your points on this!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1957</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:27:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1957</guid> <description>Using the subheadlines is good if you have already used the &quot;higher&quot; ones. It&#039;s like writing well structured white paper or article, subheadlines structure the whole thing for both the search engines and the readers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I think it&#039;s very good practice to use plenty of sub-headlines - I use H2, H3 and H4 on my blog posts. If I would write a reeaally long blog post, I would probably go for H5 and H6 too, after all, that&#039;s what they are there for.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But even then, the most important keywords would be in the main headline (H1), subheadlines wouldn&#039;t matter that much for SEO (but it&#039;s still good practice to use them)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the subheadlines is good if you have already used the &#8220;higher&#8221; ones. It&#39;s like writing well structured white paper or article, subheadlines structure the whole thing for both the search engines and the readers.</p><p>So I think it&#39;s very good practice to use plenty of sub-headlines &#8211; I use H2, H3 and H4 on my blog posts. If I would write a reeaally long blog post, I would probably go for H5 and H6 too, after all, that&#39;s what they are there for.</p><p>But even then, the most important keywords would be in the main headline (H1), subheadlines wouldn&#39;t matter that much for SEO (but it&#39;s still good practice to use them)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: inservo</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1956</link> <dc:creator>inservo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1956</guid> <description>What fantastic post. It covers the - for me - most important steps to follow (keyword research, integrating the found keywords into your headline and text, linking and descriptions). I have paid a lot to get this knowledge but I am happy, that it available for free now!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One think I&#039;d like to add is that I have heard that you should not use headings &quot;smaller&quot; than h3 (so no h4 and so on). What do you think about that? Also I find it very interesting - when it comes to writing for the user - to enrich your articles with headlines and images so they are not only pure text.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What fantastic post. It covers the &#8211; for me &#8211; most important steps to follow (keyword research, integrating the found keywords into your headline and text, linking and descriptions). I have paid a lot to get this knowledge but I am happy, that it available for free now!</p><p>One think I&#39;d like to add is that I have heard that you should not use headings &#8220;smaller&#8221; than h3 (so no h4 and so on). What do you think about that? Also I find it very interesting &#8211; when it comes to writing for the user &#8211; to enrich your articles with headlines and images so they are not only pure text.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1953</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:28:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1953</guid> <description>I think the inclusion of &quot;social circle&quot; and real-time results are more important to SEO than seeing too many paid listings. This makes participating in the social media one kind of SEO too...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I have the highest respect for Ed, so I&#039;m afraid there must be something in that interview you heard. Paid or free, the front page of Google is getting filled with other listings which are not that static (paid listings, the social circle, real-time search, news, etc.), and these days you have to be in the top 5-7 instead of the old top 10 to make it to front page. And soon, it might be top 3 for some terms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But there is two part solution for this. One being what you mentioned, becoming an authoritative blog and just dominating the market. Second being fresh content. The importance of regular content become more and more important. Already now, Google values fresh content more than before.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All in all, I think the best SEO is and will be awesome, up-to-date and highly useful content (and using the principles like the ones this post will just help it even further).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the inclusion of &#8220;social circle&#8221; and real-time results are more important to SEO than seeing too many paid listings. This makes participating in the social media one kind of SEO too&#8230;</p><p>But I have the highest respect for Ed, so I&#39;m afraid there must be something in that interview you heard. Paid or free, the front page of Google is getting filled with other listings which are not that static (paid listings, the social circle, real-time search, news, etc.), and these days you have to be in the top 5-7 instead of the old top 10 to make it to front page. And soon, it might be top 3 for some terms.</p><p>But there is two part solution for this. One being what you mentioned, becoming an authoritative blog and just dominating the market. Second being fresh content. The importance of regular content become more and more important. Already now, Google values fresh content more than before.</p><p>All in all, I think the best SEO is and will be awesome, up-to-date and highly useful content (and using the principles like the ones this post will just help it even further).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tyrone Shum</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1952</link> <dc:creator>Tyrone Shum</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:36:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1952</guid> <description>Interesting post Antti. You&#039;ve got some really good tips there for SEO. I particular apply this to my blog posts: &quot;manually edit the post permalink&quot; as I find that sometimes my headings are too long, so I shorten them so the permalink doesn&#039;t look too long.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will take into consideration the other tips you recommend....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One point to note is I recently heard from Ed Dale who was interviewing a few SEO experts and they say Google is beginning to change their search engine results and will be pushing for &quot;paid&quot; listings much more than &quot;organic&quot; listings, which means SEO may not be as important in the upcoming months. The most important way to be listed in Google&#039;s search is to become an authoritative blog in your market and to dominate it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What are your thoughts?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Antti. You&#39;ve got some really good tips there for SEO. I particular apply this to my blog posts: &#8220;manually edit the post permalink&#8221; as I find that sometimes my headings are too long, so I shorten them so the permalink doesn&#39;t look too long.</p><p>Will take into consideration the other tips you recommend&#8230;.</p><p>One point to note is I recently heard from Ed Dale who was interviewing a few SEO experts and they say Google is beginning to change their search engine results and will be pushing for &#8220;paid&#8221; listings much more than &#8220;organic&#8221; listings, which means SEO may not be as important in the upcoming months. The most important way to be listed in Google&#39;s search is to become an authoritative blog in your market and to dominate it.</p><p>What are your thoughts?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joel Williams</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1951</link> <dc:creator>Joel Williams</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:02:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1951</guid> <description>Good answer thanks. I try to use anchor likes like that naturally but besides readability I never really thought about them actually helping my article. So thanks again.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good answer thanks. I try to use anchor likes like that naturally but besides readability I never really thought about them actually helping my article. So thanks again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1950</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:47:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1950</guid> <description>Thanks for the awesome tips.  I&#039;ll be sure to incorporate them into my blog immediately!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the awesome tips.  I&#39;ll be sure to incorporate them into my blog immediately!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1946</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:25:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1946</guid> <description>Joel, thanks for your comment and great question too! In short, it&#039;s very, very useful to use good anchor text for all links. And when you think about it, it makes sense, links are, or at least should be, very clear signs on what the page is about (just like the title tag and the H1 headline)...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Firstly, when there is a link on a blog post, why the link is there? It&#039;s either: a) reference/source, or b) further reading. So the link will help the search engine understand what the page is about. Google especially is the master of collecting &quot;related&quot; data, and the pages you link to will relate and be related to with your page...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The anchor text will make it clear where that link is going to. It&#039;s like a roadsign in a sense, and search engines seem to like it when we place clear roadsigns and tell others where they end up if they click. And the search engine will see the page as a place to find all those roadsigns, which is probably good for people who are lost and look for that information, so it ranks it higher for related searches.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s the theory and how I see it anyway :) So again, good anchor text is very important for both internal and external links.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel, thanks for your comment and great question too! In short, it&#39;s very, very useful to use good anchor text for all links. And when you think about it, it makes sense, links are, or at least should be, very clear signs on what the page is about (just like the title tag and the H1 headline)&#8230;</p><p>Firstly, when there is a link on a blog post, why the link is there? It&#39;s either: a) reference/source, or b) further reading. So the link will help the search engine understand what the page is about. Google especially is the master of collecting &#8220;related&#8221; data, and the pages you link to will relate and be related to with your page&#8230;</p><p>The anchor text will make it clear where that link is going to. It&#39;s like a roadsign in a sense, and search engines seem to like it when we place clear roadsigns and tell others where they end up if they click. And the search engine will see the page as a place to find all those roadsigns, which is probably good for people who are lost and look for that information, so it ranks it higher for related searches.</p><p>That&#39;s the theory and how I see it anyway :) So again, good anchor text is very important for both internal and external links.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joel Williams</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1942</link> <dc:creator>Joel Williams</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:48:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1942</guid> <description>Great post, really enjoyed it. One thing I&#039;ve never been clear on though is anchor text. I know it&#039;s great for the site you&#039;re linking to if using desirable keywords, and good for accessibility and screen readers, but how useful for SEO to your own post is it to use correct/good anchor text for external links? Thanks for the very clear article!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, really enjoyed it. One thing I&#39;ve never been clear on though is anchor text. I know it&#39;s great for the site you&#39;re linking to if using desirable keywords, and good for accessibility and screen readers, but how useful for SEO to your own post is it to use correct/good anchor text for external links? Thanks for the very clear article!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1941</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:53:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1941</guid> <description>Hi Lance. Did you mean Google PageRank (PR)? It does affect the search engine rankings a bit, so with *all* other things being equal, PR4 site will be higher than PR1. But by itself, it doesn&#039;t mean anything really, you can get to number#1 with PR0 site/page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So no need to pay that much attention to the PR. You&#039;ll see it go up eventually when you do the right things, like creating unique content regularly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lance. Did you mean Google PageRank (PR)? It does affect the search engine rankings a bit, so with *all* other things being equal, PR4 site will be higher than PR1. But by itself, it doesn&#39;t mean anything really, you can get to number#1 with PR0 site/page.</p><p>So no need to pay that much attention to the PR. You&#39;ll see it go up eventually when you do the right things, like creating unique content regularly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1940</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:48:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1940</guid> <description>Hi Michelle. Try making it a habit, that&#039;s worked for me. I start every post with the title (and include main keyword phrase in it) and after that it&#039;s all natural. The same thing with handling images for example, it doesn&#039;t take any additional time to use keywords in the image name, but over time, it will help a lot.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michelle. Try making it a habit, that&#39;s worked for me. I start every post with the title (and include main keyword phrase in it) and after that it&#39;s all natural. The same thing with handling images for example, it doesn&#39;t take any additional time to use keywords in the image name, but over time, it will help a lot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lancenelson</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1939</link> <dc:creator>lancenelson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:19:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1939</guid> <description>Hi Antti,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A superb post and so quick to the point, thank you. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would you know how much effect does Google page ranking have on geeting your post to the top on chosen key words?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thx, Lance</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Antti,</p><p>A superb post and so quick to the point, thank you.</p><p>Would you know how much effect does Google page ranking have on geeting your post to the top on chosen key words?</p><p>thx, Lance</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MichelleVandepas</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1225/seo-friendly-posts/#comment-1938</link> <dc:creator>MichelleVandepas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:11:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1225#comment-1938</guid> <description>Thanks for a clear explanation. - even thought I &#039;know&#039; all of this, I forget to do it! I&#039;m headed back to update a few of my posts!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a clear explanation. &#8211; even thought I &#39;know&#39; all of this, I forget to do it! I&#39;m headed back to update a few of my posts!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.068 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 655/656 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.zemalf.com

Served from: zemalf.com @ 2012-05-17 15:26:51 -->
