<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Quest for the Best Permalink Structure</title> <atom:link href="http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/</link> <description>Learn to Build Kick-Ass Websites the Hard Way</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Robert S. Lawrence</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-3717</link> <dc:creator>Robert S. Lawrence</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-3717</guid> <description>Thanks for the advice. I&#039;ve been using the /%postname%/ only method since I set up my blog and agree -- it&#039;s the cleanest looking, and in my case I&#039;m not too worried about the &quot;duplicate title&quot; problem.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the advice. I&#8217;ve been using the /%postname%/ only method since I set up my blog and agree &#8212; it&#8217;s the cleanest looking, and in my case I&#8217;m not too worried about the &#8220;duplicate title&#8221; problem.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Look Back on the First 365 Days of Zemalf.com</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-3620</link> <dc:creator>Look Back on the First 365 Days of Zemalf.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:31:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-3620</guid> <description>[...] the blog. In my craze of having WordPress set up the right way, I went on a quest to find the best permalink, tuned my .htaccess rules, and tried different WordPress plugins before finding the ones I use now [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the blog. In my craze of having WordPress set up the right way, I went on a quest to find the best permalink, tuned my .htaccess rules, and tried different WordPress plugins before finding the ones I use now [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Evgen Adam</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-3473</link> <dc:creator>Evgen Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 09:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-3473</guid> <description>This is really great info thank you, this is just what I need</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really great info thank you, this is just what I need</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Quest for the Best Permalink Structure &#124; Mex714&#039;s Blog</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-3430</link> <dc:creator>Quest for the Best Permalink Structure &#124; Mex714&#039;s Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:43:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-3430</guid> <description>[...] View Original Source Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)No Title5 Best SEO Tips For Bloggers          This entry was posted in wordpress. Bookmark the permalink.    &#8592; Hello&#160;world! [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View Original Source Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)No Title5 Best SEO Tips For Bloggers          This entry was posted in wordpress. Bookmark the permalink.    &larr; Hello&nbsp;world! [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: How To Get a New Blog Indexed By Google In Less Than 6 Hours</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-2506</link> <dc:creator>How To Get a New Blog Indexed By Google In Less Than 6 Hours</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:24:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-2506</guid> <description>[...] the best permalink structure, depending on your blog that would [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the best permalink structure, depending on your blog that would [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen &#8211; When it has to be done right &#124; Website In A Weekend</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-2314</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen &#8211; When it has to be done right &#124; Website In A Weekend</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:15:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-2314</guid> <description>[...] which is too rare: he did research, got numbers, and published his data. In fact, he examined the permalink structure for the top 100 blogs. He found that there is no one best way to construct permalinks. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which is too rare: he did research, got numbers, and published his data. In fact, he examined the permalink structure for the top 100 blogs. He found that there is no one best way to construct permalinks. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Definite guide to WordPress permalinks</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-2290</link> <dc:creator>Definite guide to WordPress permalinks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:58:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-2290</guid> <description>[...] the quest for the best permalink structure, this post dives into the world of WordPress (WP) and explains how WordPress handles permalinks. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the quest for the best permalink structure, this post dives into the world of WordPress (WP) and explains how WordPress handles permalinks. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-2881</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:00:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-2881</guid> <description>Thanks for a lengthy comment. Nice to see that we agreed on the best permalink structure :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But actually %postname% does not cause performance issues like other &quot;text elements&quot; in the permalink. Since WP 2.6 or so, it&#039;s no longer issue (= post_id and postname are the same, performance-wise). And yeah, I&#039;m staying away from category in the permalink nowadays, mainly for it making the URL too long for my taste and I like the post_id short-URL possibility too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a lengthy comment. Nice to see that we agreed on the best permalink structure :)</p><p>But actually %postname% does not cause performance issues like other &#8220;text elements&#8221; in the permalink. Since WP 2.6 or so, it&#39;s no longer issue (= post_id and postname are the same, performance-wise). And yeah, I&#39;m staying away from category in the permalink nowadays, mainly for it making the URL too long for my taste and I like the post_id short-URL possibility too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1846</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1846</guid> <description>Thanks for a lengthy comment. Nice to see that we agreed on the best permalink structure :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But actually %postname% does not cause performance issues like other &quot;text elements&quot; in the permalink. Since WP 2.6 or so, it&#039;s no longer issue (= post_id and postname are the same, performance-wise). And yeah, I&#039;m staying away from category in the permalink nowadays, mainly for it making the URL too long for my taste and I like the post_id short-URL possibility too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a lengthy comment. Nice to see that we agreed on the best permalink structure :)</p><p>But actually %postname% does not cause performance issues like other &#8220;text elements&#8221; in the permalink. Since WP 2.6 or so, it&#39;s no longer issue (= post_id and postname are the same, performance-wise). And yeah, I&#39;m staying away from category in the permalink nowadays, mainly for it making the URL too long for my taste and I like the post_id short-URL possibility too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ePandit</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1837</link> <dc:creator>ePandit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:24:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1837</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Using just the post name as the permalink is the most recommended option for search engine optimization, so that is an excellent option. The downside with that is that after sometime you might run into possibility of duplicate URLs that you have to manage by hand.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is another reason to use post-id in the starting of the permalink,  WordPress documentation (&lt;a href=&quot;http://codex.wordpress.org/Permalinks&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://codex.wordpress.org/Permalinks&lt;/a&gt;) strongly recommends not to use text fields (like %postname% or %category%) in the starting of permalink structure for performance reasons regarding database, instead it suggests to use a numeric field in the beginning (like %post_id%).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Including year/date in the permalink discourages the user to read the article giving the impression of being outdated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One more possible reason to include post_id (and use it instead of year/month/date etc) is that if one is planning to submit his site to Google news in the future, it requires to have a 3 or more digits identifier in the URL (and that should not be year/month/date), post_id serves that purpose well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now about including Category, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Also, for example WordPress warns about possible performance issues using category in the permalink.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;WordPress do not warn to include category in the permalink, it only recommends not to put it at the beginning of permalink.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But still, including category in the permalink has some drawbacks:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Modifying categories later breaks permalinks, as you mentioned.&lt;br&gt;2. Adding categories increases length of permalinks.&lt;br&gt;3. If the category being used in permalink is nested, the URL becomes too long. e.g. example.com/12345/internet/blogging/wordpress/best-permalink-structure/&lt;br&gt;4. If the article is having more than one category, the category is chosen randomly based on lower category-id. So, you may not include category of your choice in the URL and later if you add another category to post, the permalink can change.&lt;br&gt;5. The “/” at the end mimics a directory which a post is not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most people use category just because it add some more keywords in the permalink, keeping in mind the above drawbacks, this benefit is negligible. One can easily compensate for it by adding the extra keywords to post slug. That is, the above permalink can be example.com/12345/wordpress-best-permalink-structure/&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I agree with you, the best option is %postid%/%postname%</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Using just the post name as the permalink is the most recommended option for search engine optimization, so that is an excellent option. The downside with that is that after sometime you might run into possibility of duplicate URLs that you have to manage by hand.</p></blockquote><p>There is another reason to use post-id in the starting of the permalink,  WordPress documentation (<a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Permalinks" rel="nofollow">http://codex.wordpress.org/Permalinks</a>) strongly recommends not to use text fields (like %postname% or %category%) in the starting of permalink structure for performance reasons regarding database, instead it suggests to use a numeric field in the beginning (like %post_id%).</p><p>Including year/date in the permalink discourages the user to read the article giving the impression of being outdated.</p><p>One more possible reason to include post_id (and use it instead of year/month/date etc) is that if one is planning to submit his site to Google news in the future, it requires to have a 3 or more digits identifier in the URL (and that should not be year/month/date), post_id serves that purpose well.</p><p>Now about including Category,</p><blockquote><p>Also, for example WordPress warns about possible performance issues using category in the permalink.</p></blockquote><p>WordPress do not warn to include category in the permalink, it only recommends not to put it at the beginning of permalink.</p><p>But still, including category in the permalink has some drawbacks:</p><p>1. Modifying categories later breaks permalinks, as you mentioned.<br />2. Adding categories increases length of permalinks.<br />3. If the category being used in permalink is nested, the URL becomes too long. e.g. example.com/12345/internet/blogging/wordpress/best-permalink-structure/<br />4. If the article is having more than one category, the category is chosen randomly based on lower category-id. So, you may not include category of your choice in the URL and later if you add another category to post, the permalink can change.<br />5. The “/” at the end mimics a directory which a post is not.</p><p>Most people use category just because it add some more keywords in the permalink, keeping in mind the above drawbacks, this benefit is negligible. One can easily compensate for it by adding the extra keywords to post slug. That is, the above permalink can be example.com/12345/wordpress-best-permalink-structure/</p><p>So I agree with you, the best option is %postid%/%postname%</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SpicyWebDesigners.com by Luc Arnold - Using Permalinks on your Website</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1799</link> <dc:creator>SpicyWebDesigners.com by Luc Arnold - Using Permalinks on your Website</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:09:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1799</guid> <description>[...] Zemalf.com &#8211; Quest for the Best Permalink Structure [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Zemalf.com &#8211; Quest for the Best Permalink Structure [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hesham @ FamousBloggers</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1779</link> <dc:creator>Hesham @ FamousBloggers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:47:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1779</guid> <description>Thank a lot for your informative reply, I will think about it and let&#039;s see what will happened latter!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank a lot for your informative reply, I will think about it and let&#39;s see what will happened latter!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1739</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:42:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1739</guid> <description>I think %postname%.html is fine, several top 100 blogs use it. Personally I think it (the + .html) is &quot;old school&quot;, but on the other hand, it&#039;s just visuals, not performance or SEO. In that sense, either way is OK, switching does take some work if you do it yourself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you, or anyone else do decide to change permalink structure, just make sure to set 301 redirects right away (I use Redirection -plugin, but it didn&#039;t pick up permalink change automatically, like it does when individual posts change). In theory, WordPress is already indexing your posts with %postname%, so it might redirect automatically, but I&#039;d still set 301&#039;s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if you&#039;ve manually linked to posts internally (as you should) it&#039;s better to updated those links as well, to avoid unnecessary redirects (for this editing I used Search Regex -plugin). - So in short, switching permalink structure on the fly is advanced stuff. Proceed with caution :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think %postname%.html is fine, several top 100 blogs use it. Personally I think it (the + .html) is &#8220;old school&#8221;, but on the other hand, it&#39;s just visuals, not performance or SEO. In that sense, either way is OK, switching does take some work if you do it yourself.</p><p>If you, or anyone else do decide to change permalink structure, just make sure to set 301 redirects right away (I use Redirection -plugin, but it didn&#39;t pick up permalink change automatically, like it does when individual posts change). In theory, WordPress is already indexing your posts with %postname%, so it might redirect automatically, but I&#39;d still set 301&#39;s.</p><p>And if you&#39;ve manually linked to posts internally (as you should) it&#39;s better to updated those links as well, to avoid unnecessary redirects (for this editing I used Search Regex -plugin). &#8211; So in short, switching permalink structure on the fly is advanced stuff. Proceed with caution :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hesham @ FamousBloggers</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1738</link> <dc:creator>Hesham @ FamousBloggers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1738</guid> <description>Very informative post, I have one questions for you Antti, I am using the &quot;/%postname%/.html&quot; permalink format!  what you think of that? should I remove the .html for it? I like the structure you are using on your blog! so thought to ask you before doing crazy stuff to my blog :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative post, I have one questions for you Antti, I am using the &#8220;/%postname%/.html&#8221; permalink format!  what you think of that? should I remove the .html for it? I like the structure you are using on your blog! so thought to ask you before doing crazy stuff to my blog :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1724</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:42:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1724</guid> <description>I think %postname%.html is fine, several top 100 blogs use it. Personally I think it (the + .html) is &quot;old school&quot;, but on the other hand, it&#039;s just visuals, not performance or SEO. In that sense, either way is OK, switching does take some work if you do it yourself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you, or anyone else do decide to change permalink structure, just make sure to set 301 redirects right away (I use Redirection -plugin, but it didn&#039;t pick up permalink change automatically, like it does when individual posts change). In theory, WordPress is already indexing your posts with %postname%, so it might redirect automatically, but I&#039;d still set 301&#039;s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if you&#039;ve manually linked to posts internally (as you should) it&#039;s better to updated those links as well, to avoid unnecessary redirects (for this editing I used Search Regex -plugin). - So in short, switching permalink structure on the fly is advanced stuff. Proceed with caution :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think %postname%.html is fine, several top 100 blogs use it. Personally I think it (the + .html) is &#8220;old school&#8221;, but on the other hand, it&#39;s just visuals, not performance or SEO. In that sense, either way is OK, switching does take some work if you do it yourself.</p><p>If you, or anyone else do decide to change permalink structure, just make sure to set 301 redirects right away (I use Redirection -plugin, but it didn&#39;t pick up permalink change automatically, like it does when individual posts change). In theory, WordPress is already indexing your posts with %postname%, so it might redirect automatically, but I&#39;d still set 301&#39;s.</p><p>And if you&#39;ve manually linked to posts internally (as you should) it&#39;s better to updated those links as well, to avoid unnecessary redirects (for this editing I used Search Regex -plugin). &#8211; So in short, switching permalink structure on the fly is advanced stuff. Proceed with caution :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hesham @ FamousBloggers</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1718</link> <dc:creator>Hesham @ FamousBloggers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1718</guid> <description>Very informative post, I have one questions for you Antti, I am using the &quot;/%postname%/.html&quot; permalink format!  what you think of that? should I remove the .html for it? I like the structure you are using on your blog! so thought to ask you before doing crazy stuff to my blog :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative post, I have one questions for you Antti, I am using the &#8220;/%postname%/.html&#8221; permalink format!  what you think of that? should I remove the .html for it? I like the structure you are using on your blog! so thought to ask you before doing crazy stuff to my blog :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1628</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 06:37:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1628</guid> <description>Hi Jon and thanks for dropping by... Even if WordPress would recognize duplicate URLs it&#039;s still better to aim for unique URLs. It&#039;s probably better for SEO as well (when two pages are not competing for the keywords on the permalink)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon and thanks for dropping by&#8230; Even if WordPress would recognize duplicate URLs it&#39;s still better to aim for unique URLs. It&#39;s probably better for SEO as well (when two pages are not competing for the keywords on the permalink)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1627</link> <dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 06:31:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1627</guid> <description>Nice article. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am using just the postname.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have read somewhere that wordpress automatically notice if a new post has the same title as another one. It then changes the url to example-article-2 för example. So unique URL:s should not be a problem.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.</p><p>I am using just the postname.</p><p>I have read somewhere that wordpress automatically notice if a new post has the same title as another one. It then changes the url to example-article-2 för example. So unique URL:s should not be a problem.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Traffic Web Domain</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1614</link> <dc:creator>Traffic Web Domain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:02:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1614</guid> <description>i read an article. they said better using yourwebsitedotcom/category/blah-blahblah.html than yourwebsitedotcom/category/blah-blahblah&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;is it true ? i still learning :(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read an article. they said better using yourwebsitedotcom/category/blah-blahblah.html than yourwebsitedotcom/category/blah-blahblah</p><p>is it true ? i still learning :(</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WordPress Settings for Every Blog &#124; Zemalf.com</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1509</link> <dc:creator>WordPress Settings for Every Blog &#124; Zemalf.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:59:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1509</guid> <description>[...] to decide on what kind of permalink you should use. Here&#8217;s a post that will help you pick the best permalink structure for your [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to decide on what kind of permalink you should use. Here&#8217;s a post that will help you pick the best permalink structure for your [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gordie</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1503</link> <dc:creator>Gordie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:24:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1503</guid> <description>That&#039;s great to hear. Thanks, Antti! .-= Gordie&#039;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://lifestyledesignforyou.com/2009/12/why-you-should-make-your-life-remarkable/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why You Should Make Your Life Remarkable.&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great to hear. Thanks, Antti!<br /> .-= Gordie&#8217;s last blog ..<a href="http://lifestyledesignforyou.com/2009/12/why-you-should-make-your-life-remarkable/" rel="nofollow">Why You Should Make Your Life Remarkable.</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zemalf</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1500</link> <dc:creator>Zemalf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:04:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1500</guid> <description>Hey Nathan. /%postname%/ is arguably the best for SEO, but I just read from WordPress.org that starting permalink with any text is bad for performance, especially when the blog grows (not sure if it&#039;s like this for other blogging platforms).It&#039;s bad for performance, because WP doesn&#039;t know if the link is a folder, page, post or such, and it takes it longer to find the actual page. Plus WP has to store more data to it&#039;s database to keep track of all the pages (this is one reason why some have bloated wp_options table in the Db)).If the permalink starts with a number (e.g. year or post ID), WP immediately knows it&#039;s a post and can proceed faster.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nathan. /%postname%/ is arguably the best for SEO, but I just read from WordPress.org that starting permalink with any text is bad for performance, especially when the blog grows (not sure if it&#8217;s like this for other blogging platforms).</p><p>It&#8217;s bad for performance, because WP doesn&#8217;t know if the link is a folder, page, post or such, and it takes it longer to find the actual page. Plus WP has to store more data to it&#8217;s database to keep track of all the pages (this is one reason why some have bloated wp_options table in the Db)).</p><p>If the permalink starts with a number (e.g. year or post ID), WP immediately knows it&#8217;s a post and can proceed faster.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zemalf</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1498</link> <dc:creator>Zemalf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:57:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1498</guid> <description>Hi Patty. And choosing numeric (whether it&#039;s post ID or year/month(/day) and postname is great option, if not the best. And from permalink point of view, it&#039;s the post name in there that help the SEO.All in One SEO pack doesn&#039;t affect permalinks, but it&#039;s great help for search engine optimization e.g. by optimizing the title tag which is the most important on-page SEO factor.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patty. And choosing numeric (whether it&#8217;s post ID or year/month(/day) and postname is great option, if not the best. And from permalink point of view, it&#8217;s the post name in there that help the SEO.</p><p>All in One SEO pack doesn&#8217;t affect permalinks, but it&#8217;s great help for search engine optimization e.g. by optimizing the title tag which is the most important on-page SEO factor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patty Reiser</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1496</link> <dc:creator>Patty Reiser</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:27:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1496</guid> <description>As for me, when I switched to a self-hosted blog format, I chose the structure of: year/month/post nameI think the one thing that has helped me is using the All in one SEO with every post.  I wasn&#039;t at first but lately I have gotten to where I do it with every post and I have noticed an improvement to the traffic I am getting. .-= Patty Reiser&#039;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://pkphotography.us/2009/12/tuesdays-digital-tutorial-6/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tuesday’s Digital Tutorial #6&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for me, when I switched to a self-hosted blog format, I chose the structure of:<br /> year/month/post name</p><p>I think the one thing that has helped me is using the All in one SEO with every post.  I wasn&#8217;t at first but lately I have gotten to where I do it with every post and I have noticed an improvement to the traffic I am getting.<br /> .-= Patty Reiser&#8217;s last blog ..<a href="http://pkphotography.us/2009/12/tuesdays-digital-tutorial-6/" rel="nofollow">Tuesday’s Digital Tutorial #6</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zemalf</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1150/best-permalink-structure/#comment-1487</link> <dc:creator>Zemalf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:25:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1150#comment-1487</guid> <description>Post ID is an unique, usually numeric, identifier for a post. For example, this post in question has the post ID 1150.Everything in a content management system, which WordPress and many other blogging platforms are, everything in the database has unique identifier. That&#039;s the way for the dynamic system to find what it&#039;s looking for.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post ID is an unique, usually numeric, identifier for a post. For example, this post in question has the post ID 1150.</p><p>Everything in a content management system, which WordPress and many other blogging platforms are, everything in the database has unique identifier. That&#8217;s the way for the dynamic system to find what it&#8217;s looking for.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 652/655 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.zemalf.com

Served from: zemalf.com @ 2012-02-08 08:33:38 -->
