<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The most essential .htaccess rules for blogs</title> <atom:link href="http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/</link> <description>Learn to Build Kick-Ass Websites the Hard Way</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-3534</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-3534</guid> <description>All modern browsers support gzipped content, including mobile browsers (since compressing pages saves bandwidth). Finding a browser / system that doesn&#039;t &quot;get&quot; the gzipped pages is rare :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All modern browsers support gzipped content, including mobile browsers (since compressing pages saves bandwidth). Finding a browser / system that doesn&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; the gzipped pages is rare :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pallab</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-3533</link> <dc:creator>Pallab</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-3533</guid> <description>Am I right in assuming (from your code) that the gzipped website is served only to Fx and Ie users?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I right in assuming (from your code) that the gzipped website is served only to Fx and Ie users?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: More WordPress Resources &#124; Spork Marketing Blog</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-3163</link> <dc:creator>More WordPress Resources &#124; Spork Marketing Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:07:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-3163</guid> <description>[...] &#8211; If you&#8217;re looking for great info on what an .htaccess file is and what it should do, or if you need help with speeding up your WordPress install, this site has some great resources. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; If you&#8217;re looking for great info on what an .htaccess file is and what it should do, or if you need help with speeding up your WordPress install, this site has some great resources. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-3031</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:32:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-3031</guid> <description>Roch, I don&#039;t understand your question - No one has access to your domain, but you. If someone can use your domain name to redirect stuff, you&#039;ve been hacked.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roch, I don&#39;t understand your question &#8211; No one has access to your domain, but you. If someone can use your domain name to redirect stuff, you&#39;ve been hacked.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roch</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-3024</link> <dc:creator>Roch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 05:51:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-3024</guid> <description>Do you know of anyway with htaccess to disable someone from using your domain to point to their own website on the same server? Ex: they use &lt;a href=&quot;http://YOURDOMAIN.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;YOURDOMAIN.com&lt;/a&gt; to promote their PHISHING WEBSITE.COM by using this simple URL to send users : YOURDOMAIN.COM/~phishing/file.html&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know of anyway with htaccess to disable someone from using your domain to point to their own website on the same server? Ex: they use <a href="http://YOURDOMAIN.com" rel="nofollow">YOURDOMAIN.com</a> to promote their PHISHING WEBSITE.COM by using this simple URL to send users : YOURDOMAIN.COM/~phishing/file.html</p><p>Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: How to Make Your Blog SEO Friendly</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-2771</link> <dc:creator>How to Make Your Blog SEO Friendly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:06:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-2771</guid> <description>[...] for search engine optimization, so keep that in mind as well, so use caching and set the essential .htaccess rules. Your blog should not be cluttered with &quot;cool features&quot; that slow it down and you shouldn&#039;t ruin it [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for search engine optimization, so keep that in mind as well, so use caching and set the essential .htaccess rules. Your blog should not be cluttered with &quot;cool features&quot; that slow it down and you shouldn&#39;t ruin it [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: .htaccess rules for site speed optimization</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-2606</link> <dc:creator>.htaccess rules for site speed optimization</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 21:20:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-2606</guid> <description>[...] done a post about .htaccess rules before, but I wanted to make a simplified version for those who don&#039;t need all the technical [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] done a post about .htaccess rules before, but I wanted to make a simplified version for those who don&#39;t need all the technical [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dnn developers programmers</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-2494</link> <dc:creator>dnn developers programmers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:13:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-2494</guid> <description>Hey as I don&#039;t know very much about blog commenting I had done several mistakes, but after reading you blog it will be easy to avoid them. thanks a lot for this nice and informative post. i will share this others so that they can take benefit of this wonderful post. Keep up the good work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey as I don&#39;t know very much about blog commenting I had done several mistakes, but after reading you blog it will be easy to avoid them. thanks a lot for this nice and informative post. i will share this others so that they can take benefit of this wonderful post. Keep up the good work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antti Kokkonen</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-2037</link> <dc:creator>Antti Kokkonen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:24:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-2037</guid> <description>You&#039;re welcome Sebastian, I&#039;m just happy this was useful for you! Thank you for taking the time to comment and sharing the post on Twitter too :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re welcome Sebastian, I&#39;m just happy this was useful for you! Thank you for taking the time to comment and sharing the post on Twitter too :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sebastian Fiedler</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-2036</link> <dc:creator>Sebastian Fiedler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:56:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-2036</guid> <description>Awesome post. Thanks for helping to make my blog more secure!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome post. Thanks for helping to make my blog more secure!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zemalf</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-1524</link> <dc:creator>Zemalf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:29:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-1524</guid> <description>Thanks Dave, I&#039;m happy to be of assistance :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave, I&#8217;m happy to be of assistance :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave Doolin</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-1522</link> <dc:creator>Dave Doolin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:38:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-1522</guid> <description>Yep.  This article represents probably weeks of work and testing.  I&#039;ll be referring back to it and linking to it.  It turns out I have a draft blog post in my queue on this exact topic, and I am so happy I don&#039;t need to finish it! .-= Dave Doolin&#039;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebsiteInAWeekend/~3/j0kd3nY7yNM/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Static Versus Dynamic Websites – Operational, Informational, Interactional&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  This article represents probably weeks of work and testing.  I&#8217;ll be referring back to it and linking to it.  It turns out I have a draft blog post in my queue on this exact topic, and I am so happy I don&#8217;t need to finish it!<br /> .-= Dave Doolin&#8217;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebsiteInAWeekend/~3/j0kd3nY7yNM/" rel="nofollow">Static Versus Dynamic Websites – Operational, Informational, Interactional</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Lancaster</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-1386</link> <dc:creator>Jason Lancaster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:53:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-1386</guid> <description>I was stunned to learn that as well. It&#039;s a big disappointment, actually. If I weren&#039;t so invested in them I would consider changing, but instead I&#039;ll just use the manual gzip option and lobby for a change.Thanks again.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was stunned to learn that as well. It&#8217;s a big disappointment, actually. If I weren&#8217;t so invested in them I would consider changing, but instead I&#8217;ll just use the manual gzip option and lobby for a change.</p><p>Thanks again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zemalf</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-1372</link> <dc:creator>Zemalf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:26:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-1372</guid> <description>Hi there Jason, and thank you for a fantastic comment in return. I&#039;m just putting stuff together I&#039;ve learned from others :)I didn&#039;t know GoDaddy doesn&#039;t have any compression enabled. I&#039;m stunned actually. So thanks for the post suggestion, I will definitely take a look at that, as I&#039;m planning on continuing this &quot;series&quot; about blog optimization. Web optimizing and tweaking is a passion of mine - there is no such thing as &quot;too fast loading blog&quot; :)As a side note, it is possible to just compress the CSS and JS files manually. And in some cases the static files like main CSS should be compressed anyway, as it doesn&#039;t change, why not compress it once, instead of everytime someone loads it, right? But on the fly compression is perfect for all the third party things like plugins get the benefit too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there Jason, and thank you for a fantastic comment in return. I&#8217;m just putting stuff together I&#8217;ve learned from others :)</p><p>I didn&#8217;t know GoDaddy doesn&#8217;t have any compression enabled. I&#8217;m stunned actually. So thanks for the post suggestion, I will definitely take a look at that, as I&#8217;m planning on continuing this &#8220;series&#8221; about blog optimization. Web optimizing and tweaking is a passion of mine &#8211; there is no such thing as &#8220;too fast loading blog&#8221; :)</p><p>As a side note, it is possible to just compress the CSS and JS files manually. And in some cases the static files like main CSS should be compressed anyway, as it doesn&#8217;t change, why not compress it once, instead of everytime someone loads it, right? But on the fly compression is perfect for all the third party things like plugins get the benefit too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Lancaster</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-1369</link> <dc:creator>Jason Lancaster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 06:14:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-1369</guid> <description>FANTASTIC post - great combination of explanation and useful code. I&#039;d like to add a note and make a suggestion for a future post.I use GoDaddy hosting and recommend them to my clients. Unfortunately, GoDaddy does not enable Mod_deflate or Mod_Gzip, so compression isn&#039;t possible using the methods you describe.There IS a work-around for compressing JS and CSS (requires mod rewrite and shell access). I&#039;ve found a couple of people that do an OK job of explaining the process, but I&#039;d like to read a post from you on the subject, i.e. Gzip compression for WP blogs on Godaddy, or something like that...just an idea.BTW, someday I&#039;d like to wake-up and have your depth of htaccess knowledge.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FANTASTIC post &#8211; great combination of explanation and useful code. I&#8217;d like to add a note and make a suggestion for a future post.</p><p>I use GoDaddy hosting and recommend them to my clients. Unfortunately, GoDaddy does not enable Mod_deflate or Mod_Gzip, so compression isn&#8217;t possible using the methods you describe.</p><p>There IS a work-around for compressing JS and CSS (requires mod rewrite and shell access). I&#8217;ve found a couple of people that do an OK job of explaining the process, but I&#8217;d like to read a post from you on the subject, i.e. Gzip compression for WP blogs on Godaddy, or something like that&#8230;just an idea.</p><p>BTW, someday I&#8217;d like to wake-up and have your depth of htaccess knowledge.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zemalf</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-1286</link> <dc:creator>Zemalf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:17:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-1286</guid> <description>It&#039;s my general rule to have the access rules at the beginning, as if something is fordidden/restricted, placing the rules to the beginning makes sure a request is stopped if rules say so. However, the most important thing is that all rules work as intended, and it sounds your 301 found its place already :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s my general rule to have the access rules at the beginning, as if something is fordidden/restricted, placing the rules to the beginning makes sure a request is stopped if rules say so. However, the most important thing is that all rules work as intended, and it sounds your 301 found its place already :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Warriner</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-1285</link> <dc:creator>Steve Warriner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:22:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-1285</guid> <description>Zemalf, it was a 301 redirect. And you have answered my question why it didn&#039;t work at the end where my control panel put it, because it came after code put in by my short url plugin from synected.com, which of course has &lt;code&gt;RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} &amp; RewriteRule&lt;/code&gt; in the code. Makes sense now thanks.What you said about rules restricting access should be 1st, means I should move the 301 down below them, it is currently 1st.You have a new Twitter follower and subscriber to this blog! Steve aka JEDs</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zemalf, it was a 301 redirect. And you have answered my question why it didn&#8217;t work at the end where my control panel put it, because it came after code put in by my short url plugin from synected.com, which of course has <code>RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} &amp; RewriteRule</code> in the code. Makes sense now thanks.</p><p>What you said about rules restricting access should be 1st, means I should move the 301 down below them, it is currently 1st.</p><p>You have a new Twitter follower and subscriber to this blog! Steve aka JEDs</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zemalf</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-1282</link> <dc:creator>Zemalf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:52:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-1282</guid> <description>Hi Steve. What kind of redirect you&#039;re trying to add?Without knowing the spesifics it is possible that there is conflicting redirect or rule in there, e.g. some other redirect or such. Thus, you should find the right &quot;spot&quot; for the rule before/after/between the rules. Look for other rules with &lt;code&gt;RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} &amp; RewriteRule&lt;/code&gt;, which do the redirect.In general, everything that restricts access should be at the very top and for example the WordPress rule (added at install) should be at the very end.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve. What kind of redirect you&#8217;re trying to add?</p><p>Without knowing the spesifics it is possible that there is conflicting redirect or rule in there, e.g. some other redirect or such. Thus, you should find the right &#8220;spot&#8221; for the rule before/after/between the rules. Look for other rules with <code>RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} &#038; RewriteRule</code>, which do the redirect.</p><p>In general, everything that restricts access should be at the very top and for example the WordPress rule (added at install) should be at the very end.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Warriner</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-1281</link> <dc:creator>Steve Warriner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:25:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-1281</guid> <description>This is great stuff and explained so we can use it, thanks.Can you advise regarding the order that things go into the .htaccess? I have 2 plugins that have written to it along with the code to prevent directory access and to wpconfig. I used my control panel to add a redirect, but had to move it from where the control panel put it to the front of the file before it would work. (This was a while ago)http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/howto/htaccess.html#how explains that directives are processed in the order they are found. Not understanding all of the code in the plugins&#039; directives, I still don&#039;t understand why the redirect wasn&#039;t processed when it was at the end of the file.Just wondered if you had any advice about the order that these rules are put into the file, and relative to other directives. Thanks again!JEDs .-= Steve Warriner&#039;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jedsweb/~3/GJFZuX_IZKM/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FTC Guidelines – One More Day&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great stuff and explained so we can use it, thanks.</p><p>Can you advise regarding the order that things go into the .htaccess? I have 2 plugins that have written to it along with the code to prevent directory access and to wpconfig. I used my control panel to add a redirect, but had to move it from where the control panel put it to the front of the file before it would work. (This was a while ago)</p><p><a href="http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/howto/htaccess.html#how" rel="nofollow">http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/howto/htaccess.html#how</a> explains that directives are processed in the order they are found. Not understanding all of the code in the plugins&#8217; directives, I still don&#8217;t understand why the redirect wasn&#8217;t processed when it was at the end of the file.</p><p>Just wondered if you had any advice about the order that these rules are put into the file, and relative to other directives. Thanks again!</p><p>JEDs<br /> .-= Steve Warriner&#8217;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jedsweb/~3/GJFZuX_IZKM/" rel="nofollow">FTC Guidelines – One More Day</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zemalf</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-1014</link> <dc:creator>Zemalf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:17:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-1014</guid> <description>WP Super Cache actually does handle compression for the HTML is caches, but only if your host has mod_deflate active. And the compression option in the plugin&#039;s settings should also be enabled.There are other plugins that handles compressing the CSS, javascript, images (like &lt;a href=&quot;http://zemalf.com/wordpress/wordpress-plugins/automatic-image-compression-smushit/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SmushIt for WordPress&lt;/a&gt; I wrote about earlier), etc.But setting the .htaccess rules in this post just once takes care of a lot of this as well (which you can take improve even further with other tweaks and optimizing plugins)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WP Super Cache actually does handle compression for the HTML is caches, but only if your host has mod_deflate active. And the compression option in the plugin&#8217;s settings should also be enabled.</p><p>There are other plugins that handles compressing the CSS, javascript, images (like <a href="http://zemalf.com/wordpress/wordpress-plugins/automatic-image-compression-smushit/" rel="nofollow">SmushIt for WordPress</a> I wrote about earlier), etc.</p><p>But setting the .htaccess rules in this post just once takes care of a lot of this as well (which you can take improve even further with other tweaks and optimizing plugins)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Udegbunam Chukwudi</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-935</link> <dc:creator>Udegbunam Chukwudi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:21:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-935</guid> <description>I&#039;m not quite good at this whole .htaccess thing. Each attempt I&#039;ve made at hacking it has left me locked out of my dashboard or even the site. So far so good I&#039;ve only used the browser caching tricks to speed up th load time of my blogs and they work. WP Super Cache should automatically take care of compression and stuff like that. .-= Udegbunam Chukwudi&#039;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StrictlyOnlineBiz/~3/ivf1t2FDSbc/visa-payoneer-mastercard-for-nigerians.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How To Get A Visa or MasterCard In Nigeria&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not quite good at this whole .htaccess thing. Each attempt I&#8217;ve made at hacking it has left me locked out of my dashboard or even the site. So far so good I&#8217;ve only used the browser caching tricks to speed up th load time of my blogs and they work.<br /> WP Super Cache should automatically take care of compression and stuff like that.<br /> .-= Udegbunam Chukwudi&#8217;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StrictlyOnlineBiz/~3/ivf1t2FDSbc/visa-payoneer-mastercard-for-nigerians.html" rel="nofollow">How To Get A Visa or MasterCard In Nigeria</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zemalf</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-888</link> <dc:creator>Zemalf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:05:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-888</guid> <description>I&#039;m happy you found the post useful -- and if I managed to make it understandable, even better! Thank you Amy</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy you found the post useful &#8212; and if I managed to make it understandable, even better! Thank you Amy</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amy LeForge</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-862</link> <dc:creator>Amy LeForge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:37:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-862</guid> <description>Holy moly, that&#039;s a huge post!  And very useful.  I admit that most of this has been over my head for some time now, but you make it understandable.  Thank you! .-= Amy LeForge&#039;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EarnestParenting/~3/B-WpIybOkGE/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My Day In Court&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy moly, that&#8217;s a huge post!  And very useful.  I admit that most of this has been over my head for some time now, but you make it understandable.  Thank you!<br /> .-= Amy LeForge&#8217;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EarnestParenting/~3/B-WpIybOkGE/" rel="nofollow">My Day In Court</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AskApache</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-812</link> <dc:creator>AskApache</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:35:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-812</guid> <description>This info is accurate and up-to-date, most of these topics you make seem easy and too good to be true, but most of the methods you explain are pretty cutting-edge for htaccess, like just in the past 1-5 years or so.The short and concise explanations with code was great to read and easy to get through, something I really need to practice ;)  I hope you write about something I don&#039;t already know for your next article... What an intro to htaccess!Subscribed! .-= AskApache&#039;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.askapache.com/~r/apache/htaccess/~3/0rMfz7Va7gg/anti-hotlinking-mod_rewrite.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Protecting Files with Advanced Mod_Rewrite Anti-Hotlinking&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This info is accurate and up-to-date, most of these topics you make seem easy and too good to be true, but most of the methods you explain are pretty cutting-edge for htaccess, like just in the past 1-5 years or so.</p><p>The short and concise explanations with code was great to read and easy to get through, something I really need to practice ;)  I hope you write about something I don&#8217;t already know for your next article&#8230; What an intro to htaccess!</p><p>Subscribed!<br /> .-= AskApache&#8217;s last blog ..<a href="http://feeds.askapache.com/~r/apache/htaccess/~3/0rMfz7Va7gg/anti-hotlinking-mod_rewrite.html" rel="nofollow">Protecting Files with Advanced Mod_Rewrite Anti-Hotlinking</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zemalf</title><link>http://zemalf.com/1076/blog-htaccess-rules/#comment-803</link> <dc:creator>Zemalf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:09:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://zemalf.com/?p=1076#comment-803</guid> <description>Hey there. Turning off mod_deflate is quite short-sighted for the webhost imho -- I&#039;d be leaving such a host in a heartbeat. Shared hosting does not have to mean &quot;minimum functionality&quot;, but I guess those hosting providers try to squeeze everything out of their machines instead of adding capacity.I&#039;m on a shared hosting on &lt;a href=&quot;http://zemalf.com/recommends/dreamhost/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DreamHost&lt;/a&gt;, and the mod_deflate is in use and it&#039;s all been good so far.About the cache and WP-Super Cache: The browser cache settings help in a sense that returning visitor or the ones going from page to page have the images, css and such cached on their browser = goodness. On the other hand, for one-time visitor (visiting one page) browser cache doesn&#039;t do anything.As a side note, I think WP-Super Cache compression option uses mod_deflate, so if you don&#039;t have that on your server, don&#039;t try to activate compression for WP-Super Cache either.WP-Super Cache stores the html pages in it&#039;s cache, delivers those to the visitor and sets (browser cache) expiration times for the HTML pages to 5 minutes and it&#039;s own cache is one hour or 3600 seconds by default.With cached HTML from WP-Super Cache (which means no dynamic page must be generated every time), common css and images can be loaded into cache once and then loaded from cache on the following visits/pages. So yeah, cache settings are very useful, even with WP-Super Cache.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there. Turning off mod_deflate is quite short-sighted for the webhost imho &#8212; I&#8217;d be leaving such a host in a heartbeat. Shared hosting does not have to mean &#8220;minimum functionality&#8221;, but I guess those hosting providers try to squeeze everything out of their machines instead of adding capacity.</p><p>I&#8217;m on a shared hosting on <a href="http://zemalf.com/recommends/dreamhost/" rel="nofollow">DreamHost</a>, and the mod_deflate is in use and it&#8217;s all been good so far.</p><p>About the cache and WP-Super Cache: The browser cache settings help in a sense that returning visitor or the ones going from page to page have the images, css and such cached on their browser = goodness. On the other hand, for one-time visitor (visiting one page) browser cache doesn&#8217;t do anything.</p><p>As a side note, I think WP-Super Cache compression option uses mod_deflate, so if you don&#8217;t have that on your server, don&#8217;t try to activate compression for WP-Super Cache either.</p><p>WP-Super Cache stores the html pages in it&#8217;s cache, delivers those to the visitor and sets (browser cache) expiration times for the HTML pages to 5 minutes and it&#8217;s own cache is one hour or 3600 seconds by default.</p><p>With cached HTML from WP-Super Cache (which means no dynamic page must be generated every time), common css and images can be loaded into cache once and then loaded from cache on the following visits/pages. So yeah, cache settings are very useful, even with WP-Super Cache.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.073 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 652/655 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.zemalf.com

Served from: zemalf.com @ 2012-02-08 08:13:20 -->
